Explaining Popular Support for Environmental Protection
By Jos Gelissen. 2007
381 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Marketing, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/26e429274242f92e50ff9f01b2a60f3c7163030d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
- Adam Mayer
- E. K. Smith
- Jennifer E. Givens
- A. Coy
- Benjamin Le
- Dominikus Vogl
- Marianne Ryghaug
- Henrik Karlstrøm
In Marketing
- Adam Mayer
- E. K. Smith
- Dominikus Vogl
- Jennifer E. Givens
- Marianne Ryghaug
- Henrik Karlstrøm
- Mark Lubell
- Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh
In Sociology and Political Science
- A. Coy
- Jody L. Davis
- Benjamin Le
- Dominikus Vogl
- Jennifer E. Givens
- Marianne Ryghaug
- Henrik Karlstrøm
- Adam Mayer
Citations in the corpus
- Environmental Behavior in Cross-National Perspective (2017, background): “Compositional effects occur when intergroup differences in an outcome are the result of differences in group composition, that is, in the characteristics of the individuals who make up the group (Gelissen, 2007).”
- Building a model of commitment to the natural environment to predict ecological behavior and willingness to sacrifice (2011, background): “Willingness to sacrifice financially for the environment has been associated with demographic variables such as income and education (Gelissen, 2007).”
- Public attitudes towards renewable energy technologies in Norway. The role of party preferences (2014, background): “As a final caveat we add that there is evidence for considerable differences in public support for renewables in various countries (Gelissen 2007), so the findings we present are not necessarily applicable outside Norway.”
- The Effects of Affluence, Economic Development, and Environmental Degradation on Environmental Concern: A Multilevel Analysis (2011, methodology): “…with higher rates of environmental concern, we find, counter to Inglehart, that national-level affluence is associated with lower levels of environmental concern, in line with the results of Gelissen (2007) as well as some of the findings of Dunlap and Mertig (1997) and Dunlap and York (2008).”
- What explains public support for climate policies? A review of empirical and experimental studies (2016, background): “…countries that economic conditions associated with higher economic growth and employment tend to be linked with higher environmental concern and support for environmental protection (Franzen & Vogl, 2013; Gelissen, 2007; Halbheer, Niggli, & CLIMATE POLICY Schmutzler, 2006; Scruggs & Benegal, 2012).”
- A social trap for the climate? Collective action, trust and climate change risk perception in 35 countries (2018, background): “…environmental concern than poor nations (Diekmann and Franzen, 1999; Franzen, 2003; Franzen and Vogl, 2013a, 2013b; Freymeyer and Johnson, 2010; Gelissen, 2007; Kemmelmeier et al., 2002) while others have found the opposite (Brechin and Kempton 1994, Brechin 1999, Dunlap and York et al., 2008,…”
- Two Decades of Measuring Environmental Attitudes: A Comparative Analysis of 33 Countries (2013, background): “Particularly, much debate has been devoted to the hypothesis that more affluent countries display higher levels of concern (Brechin and Kempton, 1994; Brechin and Bhandari, 2011; Diekmann and Franzen, 1999; Dunlap and York, 2008; Franzen, 2003; Gelissen, 2007).”