Optimization of the foam-filled aluminum tubes for crush box application

186 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

On the crashworthiness performance of thin-walled energy absorbers: Recent advances and future developments (2017, methodology): “MCF was also used in a contradictory way in the optimisation studies where some researchers [185], [235] suggested low levels for MCF to reduce the injuries risk and others [236] maintained high MCF to increase the energy absorption capacity.”
Crush analysis and multi-objective optimization design for circular tube under quasi-static lateral loading (2015, background): “The principle ways of destroying tubes include lateral compression [7-11], lateral indentation [12-13], axial crushing [14-16], tube inversion [17], and tube splitting [18].”
Multiobjective optimization for empty and foam-filled square columns under oblique impact loading (2013, methodology): “For example, Zarei and Kröger employed multiobjective optimization to maximize the energy absorption and minimize the weight of honeycomb [15] and foam-filled [16,17] aluminum tubes under either axial or bending load.”