Evaluating least-cost model predictions with empirical dispersal data: A case-study using radiotracking data of hedgehogs (Erinaceus europaeus)

149 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Quantifying and disentangling dispersal in metacommunities: how close have we come? How far is there to go? (2010, background): “…the target with the least cost, or the cumulative cost of a particular path is used to assess the connectivity (Broquet et al. 2006), increased values equating with decreased probability (Bender and Fahrig 2005; Driezen et al. 2007; see references and O’Brien et al. 2006 for detailed outline).”
Use of resistance surfaces for landscape genetic studies: considerations for parameterization and analysis (2010, methodology): “2008), radio-telemetry, GPS, or satellite tracking (O’Brien et al. 2006; Driezen et al. 2007; Epps et al. 2007; Chietkiewicz & Boyce 2009) and experimental movement studies (Michels et al.”
Placing linkages among fragmented habitats: do least‐cost models reflect how animals use landscapes? (2011, methodology): “…range in habitat selection or movement decisions (e.g. radio or global positioning system tracking: Beier 1995; Cushman, Chase & Griffin 2010; Driezen et al. 2007; Richard & Armstrong 2010; experimental data: Stevens et al. 2006; Hadley & Betts 2010) and using model selection to better…”
Graph models of habitat mosaics. (2009, methodology): “Driezen et al. (2007) used telemetry data to verify least-cost links estimated for the hedgehog (Erinaceus europaeus).”