Computer-intensive methods for testing hypotheses
By E. Hollas, Eric W. Noreen. 1989
Subfields: Statistics and Probability
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Statistics and Probability
- Ramakanth Pasunuru
- Lisa Bauer
- Louis Martin
- Mohit Bansal
- Jennifer Neville
- Wen-tau Yih
- Tong Niu
- Michael Wood
Citations in the corpus
- Efficient Large Scale Language Modeling with Mixtures of Experts (2021, background): “05) difference between best and worst scores based on bootstrap test (Noreen, 1989; Efron and Tibshirani, 1994).”
- Reliability and Learnability of Human Bandit Feedback for Sequence-to-Sequence Reinforcement Learning (2018, methodology): “6 We test for statistical significance with approximate randomization (Noreen, 1989).”
- Introduction to the CoNLL-2003 Shared Task: Language-Independent Named Entity Recognition (2003, methodology): “For all the F β =1 rates we have estimated sig-nificance boundaries by using bootstrap resampling (Noreen, 1989).”
- Automatically Learning Data Augmentation Policies for Dialogue Tasks (2019, methodology): “Statistical significance is computed via the bootstrap test (Noreen, 1989) over 100K samples.”
- Continual and Multi-Task Architecture Search (2019, neutral): “01, and statistically equal on RTE and WNLI (where the validations sets are very small), based on the bootstrap test (Noreen, 1989; Efron and Tibshirani, 1994) with 100K samples.”
- Fast Abstractive Summarization with Reinforce-Selected Sentence Rewriting (2018, methodology): “We calculate statistical significance based on the bootstrap test (Noreen, 1989; Efron and Tibshirani, 1994) with 100K samples.”
- GraDA: Graph Generative Data Augmentation for Commonsense Reasoning (2022, methodology): “Statistical significance is computed with 100K samples using bootstrap (Noreen, 1989; Tibshirani and Efron, 1993).”
- Reinforced Video Captioning with Entailment Rewards (2017, methodology): “05 for BLEU, based on the bootstrap test (Noreen, 1989; Efron and Tibshirani, 1994).”
- Soft Layer-Specific Multi-Task Summarization with Entailment and Question Generation (2018, methodology): “answer-span prediction classifier from Pasunuru and Bansal (2018) trained on SQuAD (Rajpurkar et al.”
- Bandit Structured Prediction for Neural Sequence-to-Sequence Learning (2017, methodology): “Objective (1) is known from minimum risk training (Och, 2003) and has been lifted to NMT by Shen et al. (2016) – but not for learning from weak feedback.”
- On the Importance of Text Analysis for Stock Price Prediction (2014, methodology): “We used approximate randomization (Hoeffding, 1952; Noreen, 1989) for checking statistical significance.”
- GraDA: Graph Generative Data Augmentation for Commonsense Reasoning (2022, methodology): “Statistical significance is computed with 100K samples using bootstrap (Noreen, 1989; Tibshirani and Efron, 1993).”
- Polite Dialogue Generation Without Parallel Data (2018, methodology): “significance via the bootstrap test (Noreen, 1989; Efron and Tibshirani, 1994) with 100K samples.”
- Securities Price Consequences of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and Related Events (2001, unknown): “To control for this bias, we conduct a randomization test (Noreen 1989).”
- A paired comparison approach for the analysis of sets of Likert-scale responses (2007, methodology): “To obtain an understanding of how well the model fits the data, we simulated the distribution Statistical Modelling 2007; 7(1): 3–28 of the deviance by a Monte Carlo test procedure (see e.g. Noreen, 1989).”
- Commonsense for Generative Multi-Hop Question Answering Tasks (2018, methodology): “significance computed using bootstrap test with 100K iterations (Noreen, 1989; Efron and Tibshirani, 1994).”
- When Choosing Plausible Alternatives, Clever Hans can be Clever (2019, methodology): “p-values according to Approximate Randomization Tests (Noreen, 1989), with ∗ indicating a significant difference between performance on Easy and Hard p < 5%.”
- Adversarial Over-Sensitivity and Over-Stability Strategies for Dialogue Models (2018, methodology): “significance via the bootstrap test (Noreen, 1989; Efron and Tibshirani, 1994) with 100K samples, and consider p < 0.”