FE2 multiscale approach for modelling the elastoviscoplastic behaviour of long fibre SiC/Ti composite materials

By F. Feyel, J. Chaboche. 2000

1,241 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/26b172a471921b81a8908ae2259331a519d8f6ec

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Mechanics of Materials

Citations in the corpus

Multiscale structural topology optimization with an approximate constitutive model for local material microstructure (2015, positive): “To address this interface nonlinearity, we employed the FE 2 scheme [5].”
Eigendeformation-based reduced order homogenization for failure analysis of heterogeneous materials (2007, methodology): “While parallelization in space is very natural since unit cell problems are fully parallelizable in space (see for instance [16]), parallelization in time remains an outstanding issue.”
A computational library for multiscale modeling of material failure (2013, methodology): “A classical semi-concurrent multiscale method is the F E2 [37] developed originally for intact materials.”
Computational microstructure characterization and reconstruction: Review of the state-of-the-art techniques (2018, methodology): “Because for most composites the general form of the constitutive law is unknown, it is necessary to rely on direct numerical simulation (DNS) techniques [278–280] in multiscale FEA.”
Coupled multi‐scale cohesive modeling of failure in heterogeneous adhesives (2010, background): “Feyel and Chaboche [11] have described a multi-level finite element method FE2 to model fiber matrix composites.”
Multi‐scale computational homogenization–localization for propagating discontinuities using X‐FEM (2015, background): “The parallelization is natural in computational homogenization schemes, because at a given macroscopic increment and iteration, the MVE simulations are independent from each other, see, for example, [25, 31, 33].”
Computational homogenization for heterogeneous thin sheets (2010, methodology): “g the finite element method [18, 22, 23, 25], the boundary element method [27], the Voronoi cell method [16, 17], a crystal plasticity framework [19, 20] or numerical methods based on Fast Fourier Transforms [21, 28] and Transformation Field Analysis [29].”
A two‐scale approximation of the Schur complement and its use for non‐intrusive coupling (2011, methodology): “We assume that the global model is analyzed using commercial (and closed) FEA software, whereas the local model can be analyzed using dedicated software.”