A theoretical and experimental analysis of linear combiners for multiple classifier systems
By Giorgio Fumera, Fabio Roli. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2005
331 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/26b0e1327b653c0df9610aa5641006ff9c887e4c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Manuel Graña
- Michal Wozniak
- Robi Polikar
- Emilio Corchado
- Barbara Hammer
- Bartosz Krawczyk
- Alexander Rainer Tassilo Gepperth
- Gianluca Bontempi
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Citations in the corpus
- Learn$^{++}$ .NC: Combining Ensemble of Classifiers With Dynamically Weighted Consult-and-Vote for Efficient Incremental Learning of New Classes (2009, unknown): “algebraic combinations of posterior probabilities [43], [51], Dempster–Shafer combination [52], decision templates [53], or meta decision trees [54].”
- A survey of multiple classifier systems as hybrid systems (2014, methodology): “Some analytical properties and experimental evaluations of aggregating methods were presented in [10,31,143,144].”
- Ensemble based systems in decision making (2006, background): “Does the no-free-lunch theorem hold for combination rules as well? Many studies have been conducted to answer this question, including [18], [27], [28], [31], [36], [37], [42], [71], [72], among others.”