Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age
By R. Pollin. 2010
1,466 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Finance, Political Science and International Relations
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/267fccd580b782181cf1d8c424ccc733995c812a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Finance
- Yotam Margalit
- Silja Häusermann
- Thomas Kurer
- Philipp Rehm
- Simon Sturn
- Till van Treeck
- Benjamin T. Bowyer
- Christiano Perugini
In Political Science and International Relations
- Silja Häusermann
- Stefanie Walter
- Yotam Margalit
- Philipp Rehm
- Thomas Kurer
- Thomas J. Leeper
- Bruno Wüest
- Matthias Enggist
Citations in the corpus
- Biased Perceptions of Income Distribution and Preferences for Redistribution: Evidence from a Survey Experiment (2012, background): “It can also provide explanations for other puzzles in the literature, such as those pointed out by Bartels’ (2008) results on the reduced responsiveness of representatives to low-income voters.”
- How Lasting is Voter Gratitude? An Analysis of the Short- and Long-Term Electoral Returns to Beneficial Policy (2011, neutral): “Yet, many perceive citizens as having a short-lived memory when it comes to political issues and electoral choice (Achen and Bartels 2008; Bartels 2008; Campbell, Converse, Miller, and Stokes 1960; Gerber and Green 1998; Lenz 2010; Zaller 1992).”
- How Legislators Respond to Localized Economic Shocks: Evidence from Chinese Import Competition (2015, background): “Voters often “punish” incumbents for economic shocks, even when they likely played no role in their creation (e.g., Achen and Bartels 2004; Bartels 2009; Gasper and Reeves 2011; Healy, Malhotra, and Mo 2010).”
- Differential Responsiveness in Europe: The Effects of Preference Difference and Electoral Participation (2015, background): “They (Bartels 2008; Gilens 2005, 2012) find such a bias in responsiveness: the preferences of the rich appear to be systematically better represented than those of the poor.”
- Presidents and the U.S. Economy: An Econometric Exploration (2014, neutral): “Political scientists seem to prefer lags of one year or more (see Bartels 2008, Comiskey and Marsh 2012.)”
- Pushing the City Limits (2015, neutral): “These expectations are grounded in research linking Democratic identification with support for larger government, higher redistributive spending, and more progressive forms of taxation (Bartels 2008; Petrocik 1996; Petrocik, Benoit, and Hansen 2003).”
- Globalization and the Demand-Side of Politics: How Globalization Shapes Labor Market Risk Perceptions and Policy Preferences* (2015, background): “Recent research on the political representation of the interests of poorer citizens (e.g., Bartels 2008; Schäfer 2012) raises some doubts about the ability of globalization losers to mobilize, whereas it appears more likely that globalization winners can successfully promote their preferred…”
- Regulation and corruption (2015, neutral): “On the left, Kolko (1977) argues that Progressive Era regulation in theUnitedStateswas designed to benefit the economic elite, and more recently, Bartels (2008) and Hacker and Pierson (2010) make arguments along the same lines regarding contemporary politics.”
- Economic grievances and political protest (2018, background): “democratic erosion (Bartels, 2008), with unequal turnout being mirrored in unequal”
- Income Inequality and Policy Representation in the American States (2012, methodology): “…income groups within each state.14 Measures of citizens’ self-reported political ideology have been commonly used to measure public opinion in previous studies of political representation (e.g., Bartels, 2008; Erikson et al., 1993; Gray, Lowery, Fellowes, & McAtee, 2004; Griffin & Flavin, 2007).”
- Insecure Alliances: Risk, Inequality, and Support for the Welfare State (2012, background): “Yet there is good reason to think that higher income citizens have greater sway in political debates (Bartels 2008; Gilens 2005; Hacker and Pierson 2010).”