Social interactions in HRI: the robot view

By Cynthia Lynn Breazeal. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part C (Applications and Reviews), 2004

491 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Socially intelligent robots: dimensions of human–robot interaction (2007, unknown): “…the robot-centred view, we ﬁnd sociable machines, the robot-as-creature view, where a robot engages in interactions for the purpose of fulﬁlling its own internal needs, while cognitive skills and responses of humans towards it will be determined by the robot’s needs and goals (see Breazeal 2004).”
Understanding and Resolving Failures in Human-Robot Interaction: Literature Review and Model Development (2018, background): “Robots are sometimes viewed as tools, and other times viewed more as social actors (Breazeal, 2004).”
Robots for use in autism research. (2012, background): “One subarea of robotics, termed social robotics, involves robots that engage in some form of social interaction with humans, through speech, gestures, or other media (18, 19).”
Human-Robot Collaboration: A Literature Review and Augmented Reality Approach in Design (2008, background): “ Hoffmann, G. and C. Breazeal (2004).”
Technology, Humanness, and Trust: Rethinking Trust in Technology (2015, background): “For example, robots that can interact with people and online interactive avatars (e.g., Breazeal, 2004; Cassell & Bickmore, 2000) are technologies some would say are more human-like than system-like.”