Effect of drought stress and subsequent recovery on protein, carbohydrate contents, catalase and peroxidase activities in three chickpea ('Cicer arietinum') cultivars
By A. Mafakheri, A. Siosemardeh, B. Bahramnejad, Paul C. Struik, Y. Sohrabi. 2011
118 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/265cd4fd2578a67079d571ee5bd78cd9cb46b448
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- U. Jha
- Viola Devasirvatham
- A. Bohra
- D. Tan
- Sushil K. Chaturvedi
- P. Basu
- Muhammad S. Khan
- Debmalya Barh
Citations in the corpus
- Abiotic stresses, constraints and improvement strategies in chickpea (2014, background): “(i) vegetative, (ii) anthesis and (iii) both the vegetative and anthesis stage, more accumulation of carbohydrate, catalase (CAT) and peroxidase (POX) was observed in tolerant genotypes indicating the importance of CAT and POX in drought tolerance (Mafakheri et al. 2011).”
- Impact of High Temperature and Drought Stresses on Chickpea Production (2018, background): “Drought Root length density [12] Chlorophyll loss, low water potential [23] Shoot biomass and grain yield [13] Drought tolerance index [13] Early flowering [24] Carbon (∆13C) isotope discrimination during the photosynthetic activity [25] High osmatic adjustment with low water potential to maintain t”