Emotion Regulation in Romantic Relationships: The Cognitive Consequences of Concealing Feelings
By J. Richards, Emily Butler, James J. Gross. 2003
326 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/264d560a79d74565b4350dee82ffdbb3a6d70ec8
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- James J. Gross
- Michela Schröder‐Abé
- J. Richards
- Emily Butler
- Astrid Schütz
- Tiane L. Lee
- B. Schmeichel
- Heath A. Demaree
In Social Psychology
- Soujanya Poria
- Erik Cambria
- Navonil Majumder
- James J. Gross
- Rada Mihalcea
- Amir Zadeh
- Michela Schröder‐Abé
- Alexander Gelbukh
Citations in the corpus
- Emotion regulation and culture: are the social consequences of emotion suppression culture-specific? (2007, background): “As a result, it has been demonstrated that different emotion regulation strategies have differing social consequences in American samples when cultural backgrounds are ignored (Butler et al., 2003; Gross, 2002; Gross & John, 2003; John & Gross, 2004; Richards et al., 2003), but we can only conjectur”
- Cardiac vagal control predicts spontaneous regulation of negative emotional expression and subsequent cognitive performance (2010, background): “…film and express their reactions, participants who are instructed to suppress their emotional reactions perform less well both on simultaneous tasks (Richards and Gross, 1999, 2000; Bonanno et al., 2004; Richards et al., 2003) and on subsequent tasks (Baumeister et al., 1998; Muraven et al., 1998).”
- Dealing with feeling: a meta-analysis of the effectiveness of strategies derived from the process model of emotion regulation. (2012, unknown): “…affect S1 Cont1 40 91 0.34 Richards & Gross (2006) 2 Negative affect D3 Cont1 44 91 0.46 Richards et al. (2003) 1 Anxiety R2 Cont1 27 31 0.03 0.04 Richards et al. (2003) 1 Anxiety S1 Cont1 56 56 0.12 0.78 Rimes & Watkins (2005) 1 None C1 C2 15 15 0.24 Roberts et al. (2008) 1 Disgust S1 Cont1…”
- ICON: Interactive Conversational Memory Network for Multimodal Emotion Detection (2018, background): “Richards et al. (2003) attribute emotional dynamics to be an interactive phenomena, rather than being within-person.”
- The Cognitive Consequences of Concealing Feelings (2004, background): “Similarly, romantic partners who reappraised potentially upsetting conversations about relationship problems by thinking about the positive aspects of their relationship beforehand showed better memory for the conversations than partners who were asked to suppress their emotions while the conversati”
- Conversational Memory Network for Emotion Recognition in Dyadic Dialogue Videos (2018, background): “In fact, significant works have attributed emotional dynamics as an interactive phe-2123 nomenon, rather than being within-person and one-directional (Richards et al., 2003; Hareli and Rafaeli, 2008).”
- Walking in each other's Shoes: Perspective Taking Mediates Effects of Emotional Intelligence on Relationship Quality (2011, background): “Dysfunctional emotion regulation strategies such as suppression may, for example, tie up cognitive resources and may thus impede perspective taking (cf. Egloff, Schmukle, Burns, & Schwerdtfeger, 2006; Richards et al., 2003).”
- DialogueRNN: An Attentive RNN for Emotion Detection in Conversations (2018, background): “Ruusuvuori (2013) gued that emotional dynamics in a conversation is an inter-personal phenomenon (Richards, Butler, and Gross 2003).”
- Acceptance: An Historical and Conceptual Review (2010, unknown): “…Butler, & Gross, 2003; Richards & Gross, 1999) and problem solving (Baumeister, Bratslavsky, Muraven, & Tice, 1998) are compromised, and stress and anxiety escalate, as indexed by physiological (Richards et al., 2003, Study 2) and subjective (Levitt, Brown, Orsillo, & Barlow, 2004) markers.”