Photospheric flux density of magnetic helicity

By Etienne Pariat, P. Démoulin, Mitchell A. Berger. 2005

141 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/264c38bc06a305bb5fc15236e03ed9414360991d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

1. C. R. DeVore
2. Etienne Pariat
3. S. Antiochos
4. T. Magara
5. Kazunari Shibata
6. G. Aulanier
7. Brigitte Schmieder
8. C. Schrijver

In Molecular Biology

1. S. Antiochos
2. C. R. DeVore
3. Kazunari Shibata
4. Etienne Pariat
5. T. Magara
6. G. Aulanier
7. Brigitte Schmieder

Citations in the corpus

• THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING OF QUASI-HOMOLOGOUS SOLAR JETS (2010, methodology): “Similarly, by computing the helicity flux at the bottom boundary (cf. PAD09) using the Gθ method (defined in Pariat et al. 2005), we have determined upper bounds for the magnetic helicity injected and available within the closed flux for each jet: [826, 656, 725, 778].”
• A MODEL FOR SOLAR POLAR JETS (2009, unknown): “The flux of helicity through the bottom boundary can be determined by computing the helicity density defined correctly in Pariat et al. (2005): dH dt = 1 2π ∫ S ∫ S′ ( r r2 × dr dt ) z BzB ′ z dS dS ′ (9) with r = x − x′.”
• Solar Flares: Magnetohydrodynamic Processes (2011, background): “Deriving observationally how much magnetic helicity is injected into the atmosphere has widely been done, which is a key to the understanding of the relationship between helicity evolution and the occurrence of active phenomena including flares (Chae, 2001; Moon et al., 2002; Nindos and Zhang, 2002;”