Assessing Risky Social Situations

By Marc Fleurbaey. Journal of Political Economy, 2010

237 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Decision Sciences, Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2640f2395f15fdf4d0dd84978114e5d7155296b4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Decision Sciences

1. Qi Zhang
2. Shaowei Ke
3. Jingyi Xue

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Qi Zhang
2. Shaowei Ke
3. Jingyi Xue

In Philosophy

1. Qi Zhang
2. Shaowei Ke
3. Jingyi Xue

Citations in the corpus

• Randomization and Ambiguity Aversion (2020, background): “Marinacci (2001); Maccheroni, Marinacci, and Rustichini (2006); Siniscalchi (2009); CerreiaVioglio, Maccheroni, Marinacci, and Montrucchio (2011); Lehrer and Teper (2011); and Frick et al. (2019). In contrast, Seo (2009), Saito (2011), and our paper adopt the original choice domain of AA without imp”
• Fair division with uncertain needs (2018, background): “(2016); general approaches to assessing risky social situations are studied by Fleurbaey (2010) (see also Fleurbaey, Gajdos and Zuber (2015)).”
• Just luck: an experimental study of risk taking and fairness (2013, unknown): “See, among others, Harsanyi ( 1955 ) ; Diamond ( 1967 ) ; Hammond ( 1981 ) ; Fried ( 2003 ) ; Harel, Safra, and Segal ( 2005 ) ; and Fleurbaey ( 2010 ) .”