Semantics, Pragmatics, and the Role of Semantic Content

243 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Investigating scalar implicatures in a truth-value judgement task: evidence from event-related brain potentials (2016, background): “The linguistic literature provides approaches which in various ways reconcile the poles of these two debates (Chierchia, 2004; Chierchia et al., 2012; King and Stanley, 2005; Levinson, 2000).”
Sarcasm, Pretense, and The Semantics/ Pragmatics Distinction ∗ (2012, background): “Although King and Stanley (2005) are strong proponents of a semanticist methodology, they do not endorse semanticism about sarcasm.”
Truth-Conditional Pragmatics (2011, background): “Advocating the Minimalist view, however, King and Stanley (2005) claim that there is no such effect. adjectives like red are no less relative than adjectives like small.4 For example, ‘a red book’ is red in the specifi c way in which books (as opposed to cars, newspapers, birds, etc.) are red; for…”