Water poverty: towards a meaningful indicator

177 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Water Poverty Index: development and application at the community scale (2003, background): “Other contributions to the literature on this subject have been made (Salameh, 2000; Feitelson and Chenoweth, 2002) and both of those articles raise the question of how to capture effectively the issues of water for food production, and highlight the importance of infrastructure.”
Integration of the biophysical and social sciences using an indicator approach: Addressing water problems at different scales (2006, background): “Aswith all novel approaches, this has drawn some attention in both scientific literature (Salamah, 2000; Feitelson and Chenoweth, 2002; Molle and Mollinga, 2003) and the press (Hoffman and Hoffman, 2002).”
Cities versus agriculture: revisiting intersectoral water transfers, potential gains and conflicts (2006, background): “However, the sheer discrepancies in both the standards proposed and the water used in practice in diverse cities show that the debate is not yet closed (see Feitelson and Chenoweth 2002; Meinzen-Dick and Appasamy 2002; Molle and Mollinga 2003).”