Red blood cell indices of rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum) in aquaculture

By J. Řehulka, B. Minařík, E. Řehulková. 2004

120 citations recorded by the source corpus.

A direct non-parametric method was used to calculate reference (physiological) haematology values for farmed 10–12-month rainbow trout of the Kamloops strain (mean weight: 330±131 g) with respect to red blood cell counts (RBCc), haematocrit values (Hct), haemoglobin concentrations (Hb), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), mean corpuscular haemoglobin (MCH) and mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentrations (MCHC). The fish in the selected reference group (n=798) were given dry pelleted diets that contained 37–47% crude protein, 7–18% crude fat and 108–300-mg vitamin E, 1.08–5-mg folic acid, 0.018–0.05-mg vitamin B12, 48–64.5-mg iron, 4.5–8.4-mg copper and 0.18–0.24-mg selenium supplied per kg of diet. Ethoxyquin and butylhydroxytoluol were used to protect the fat component against oxidation. The fish were kept at a stocking density of 50kg per cubic metre in tanks provided with running freshwater (dissolved oxygen 8.4–11.5 mg L−1, with O2 saturation of 77–98%) at an ambient temperature of 0.2–16°C. Blood was sampled between September and November at a photoperiod of 9–13 h:11–15 h (light:dark). Reference ranges for the preceding haematological indices were as follows in immature females (males): RBCc, 0.77–1.42T L−1 (T – tera, 1012) (0.98–1.55T L−1); Hct, 0.304–0.502 (0.34–0.546); Hb, 54–93 g L−1 (59–97 g L−1); MCV, 282–469 fL (279–434 fL); MCH, 51–86 pg (47–78 pg); MCHC, 0.15–0.22 (0.15–0.2). In males, values for RBCc, Hct and Hb were significantly higher (P=0.01 and 0.0000 respectively) and those for MCV, MCH and MCHC were significantly lower (P=0.01 and 0.0002 respectively) than in immature females. Nutritional and environmental factors affecting erythropoiesis in trout and some correlations between haematological (RBCc, Hb, Hct) and biochemical indices of the blood plasma (total protein, cholesterol) are discussed.

Subfields: Aquatic Science, Immunology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2622cf0f5891d6e37208b60ee947a1976e9cfb3a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aquatic Science

  1. M. Abdel‐Tawwab
  2. Quseen Mushtaq Reshi
  3. I. Imtiaz Ahmed
  4. M. H. Ahmad
  5. F. Fazio
  6. R. Jha
  7. Alyssa M. Haygood

In Immunology

  1. M. Abdel‐Tawwab
  2. Quseen Mushtaq Reshi
  3. I. Imtiaz Ahmed
  4. M. H. Ahmad
  5. F. Fazio
  6. R. Jha
  7. Alyssa M. Haygood

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

  1. M. Abdel‐Tawwab

Citations in the corpus