CNNs found to jump around more skillfully than RNNs: Compositional Generalization in Seq2seq Convolutional Networks

By Roberto Dessì, Marco Baroni. 2019

47 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Lake and Baroni (2018) introduced the SCAN dataset probing the ability of seq2seq models to capture compositional generalizations, such as inferring the meaning of “jump around” 0-shot from the component words. Recurrent networks (RNNs) were found to completely fail the most challenging generalization cases. We test here a convolutional network (CNN) on these tasks, reporting hugely improved performance with respect to RNNs. Despite the big improvement, the CNN has however not induced systematic rules, suggesting that the difference between compositional and non-compositional behaviour is not clear-cut.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Molecular Biology, Natural Language Processing, Model Architectures

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Xinyun Chen
  2. Denny Zhou
  3. Dawn Song
  4. Quoc V. Le
  5. Luke S. Zettlemoyer
  6. Percy Liang
  7. Mohit Bansal
  8. Adams Wei Yu

In Molecular Biology

  1. Yoshua Bengio
  2. Jacob Russin
  3. Randall C. O’Reilly
  4. Jason Jo
  5. Dawn Song
  6. Marco Baroni
  7. Adams Wei Yu
  8. Stefano Ermon

In Natural Language Processing

  1. Denny Zhou
  2. Xinyun Chen
  3. Dawn Song
  4. Brenden M. Lake
  5. Marco Baroni
  6. Chen Liang
  7. Adams Wei Yu
  8. Jian-Guang Lou

In Model Architectures

  1. Dawn Song
  2. Marco Baroni
  3. Adams Wei Yu
  4. Chen Liang
  5. Xinyun Chen
  6. Denny Zhou
  7. Yoshua Bengio
  8. Randall C. O’Reilly

Citations in the corpus