Emissions Trading: Principles and Practice

By T. Tietenberg. 2006

222 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/261faf10fbcf424a65e5299be7112a9268bda327

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

Citations in the corpus

Comparing price and nonprice approaches to urban water conservation (2009, background): “[9] In the area of pollution control, the cost-effectiveness advantage of market-based approaches over CAC policies has been demonstrated theoretically [Pigou, 1920; Crocker, 1966; Dales, 1968; Montgomery, 1972; Baumol and Oates, 1988] and empirically [Keohane, 2007; Teitenberg, 2006 ].”
Understanding policy change: Multiple streams and emissions trading in Germany (2008, background): “Including emission allowances in price calculation makes economic sense because they do represent an opportunity cost ( Tietenberg, 2006 ).”
Greening Capitalism? A Marxist Critique of Carbon Markets (2012, background): “In line with its dominant neoliberal politico-economic approach in the early 1990s, the U.S. delegation argued that only market mechanisms could achieve emission reductions in an efficient and cost-effective way (Tietenberg, 2006).”
The Tragedy of Ecosystem Services (2008, unknown): “( Tietenberg 2006 ), to motivate private landowners to store additional carbon”
Origins and Development of the EU ETS (2009, unknown): “But it was the application of these ideas in the US, and the careful documentation of this experience, that has provided the meat in the analytical sandwich, and nourished the development of the instrument in Europe.9 Tietenberg (2006) provides an excellent summary of US experience, which in essence”
Reflections—The Emerging Literature on Emissions Trading in Europe (2008, background): “Some respondents made the case for Tietenberg’s book (Tietenberg 2006): This book is valuable in terms that it provides a comprehensive theoretical framework how to analyse any emission trading scheme (including the EU ETS).”
The innovation impact of the EU Emission Trading System — Findings of company case studies in the German power sector (2011, background): “Hence, overall abatement costs are minimised ensuring static efficiency (Dales, 1968; Tietenberg, 1985, 2006).4 Compliance costs are further reduced by allowing for the inflow of a certain number of certificates generated under two flexible mechanisms of the Kyoto Protocol (EU, 2004): the Clean…”
Ecosystem services from agriculture: steps for expanding markets. (2010, unknown): “The government then stimulates demand for the good by requiring regulated firms to have enough allowances tomeet a regulatory requirement (usually the discharge of a pollutant), and enforces property rights (for a complete description of trading, see Tietenberg, 2006).”
What Do Emissions Markets Deliver and to Whom? Evidence from Southern California's Nox Trading Program (2012, unknown): “In general, emissions trading program evaluation has proven to be particularly challenging (Ellerman, 2003; Stavins, 1998; Tietenberg, 2006).”
National and Sub-national Policies and Institutions (2014, background): “Earlier 18 experiences with emissions trading include for the most part subnational and national attempts at 19 dealing with local or national problems such as the California RECLAIM program and the US Acid Rain 20 program (Tietenberg, 2006; Ellerman et al., 2010).”
On The Evolution of Fiscal Federalism: Theory and Institutions (2008, background): “14 For more detailed discussions of the evolution of emissions trading, see Tietenberg (2006) and Oates (2000).”
Cap-and-Trade (2009, unknown): “There are two elements of a cap-and-trade system for greenhouse gas emissions (for a more complete introduction to cap-and-trade, see [3, 5 ]).”
Transaction costs for firms in the EU ETS: lessons from Ireland (2010, background): “The ex ante literature on tradable schemes usually neglects or incompletely anticipates the presence of transaction costs (Ellerman et al., 2005; Tietenberg, 2006).”