Availability and use of public information and conspecific density for settlement decisions in the collared flycatcher

By B. Doligez, T. Pärt, Etienne G. J. Danchin, J. Clobert, L. Gustafsson. 2004

193 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/26177eef2782fea11934e9a6c6f43f1aed7426f3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. J. Cote
2. Jukka T. Forsman
3. J. Clobert
4. M. Winter
5. Andrew J. Campomizzi
6. S. Lima

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. J. Cote
2. M. Massot
3. J. Clobert
4. Jukka T. Forsman
5. M. Winter
6. Andrew J. Campomizzi

Citations in the corpus

• From eavesdropping on performance to copying the behavior of others: a review of public information use (2007, unknown): “Breeding patches with increased patch reproductive success had significantly higher immigration rates than plots with reduced or unmanipulated reproductive success (see also the work of Doligez et al. 2004 for a review).”
• Competitor density cues for habitat quality facilitating habitat selection and investment decisions (2008, background): “Corresponding phenomenon within species (conspecific attraction and social information use; e.g., Stamps 1988; Doligez et al. 2004; Nocera et al. 2006; Fletcher 2007) affects population dynamics (e.g., Stephens and Sutherland 1999; Reed and Levine 2005).”
• Informed dispersal, heterogeneity in animal dispersal syndromes and the dynamics of spatially structured populations. (2009, background): “Individuals may acquire information about their environment through the morphology, behaviour or even reproductive success of conspecifics (Danchin et al. 2004; Doligez et al. 2004; Dall et al. 2005).”
• Conspecific Attraction is a Missing Component in Wildlife Habitat Modeling (2008, background): “…termed public information, can reflect characteristics of habitat quality that may not be easily detectable or accessible to new settlers, such as resource abundance, predator densities, and potential for reproductive success (Danchin et al. 2001; Doligez et al. 2004a, b; Donahue 2006).”
• Patch Size and Landscape Effects on Density and Nesting Success of Grassland Birds (2006, background): “…might be important as prime breeding habitat for subordinate first-year breeders (as shown for the collared flycatchers, Ficedula albicollies, by Doligez et al. 2004); 3) some small prairie patches might harbor rare species other than birds—such as the western prairie fringed orchid…”