Surface sequestration of chemical feeding deterrents in the Antarctic sponge Latrunculia apicalis as an optimal defense against sea star spongivory

By F. B. Furrow, C. Amsler, J. B. McClintock, B. Baker. 2003

98 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Antarctic Marine Biodiversity: Adaptations, Environments and Responses to Change (2018, background): “2002); the sponge Latrunculia apicalis (Furrow et al. 2003) and several other sponges (Peters et al.”
New trends in marine chemical ecology (2006, background): “The sponge contains alkaloids, namely dischorhabidins (e.g., dischorhabidin-G) that elicit a tube foot retraction response in the sea star Perkinaster focus (Yang et al. 1995; Furrow et al. 2003).”
Ecological interactions of marine sponges (2006, background): “Some sponge species concentrate predator deterrents at their surfaces (Uriz et al. 1996a; Wulff 1997b; Becerro et al. 1998; Schupp et al. 1999; Furrow et al. 2003; McClintock et al. 2005), apparently optimizing deployment of defensive metabolites.”
Antarctic marine chemical ecology: what is next? (2008, background): “1995; Ford & Capon 2000) and cause sea star tube-foot retraction (Furrow et al. 2003).”