Chapter 19 Gradient Estimation
By Michael C. Fu. 2006
107 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics and Probability
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Yarin Gal
- Alex Kendall
- Jiri Hron
- Raghu Pasupathy
- Shane G. Henderson
- Sujin Kim
- Sergey Levine
- Roberto Cipolla
In Management Science and Operations Research
In Statistics and Probability
- Raghu Pasupathy
- Shane G. Henderson
- Sujin Kim
- Yarin Gal
- Jiri Hron
- Alex Kendall
- Zhi-Hua Zhou
- Lijun Zhang
Citations in the corpus
- Concrete Dropout (2017, background): “Several estimators are available for us to do this: for example the score function estimator (also known as a likelihood ratio estimator and Reinforce [6, 12, 30, 35]), or the pathwise derivative estimator (this estimator is also referred to in the literature as the re-parametrisation trick, infinit”
- A high-bias, low-variance introduction to Machine Learning for physicists (2018, unknown): “…model, we can also easily calculate the gradient of any expectation value 〈f(x)〉model using what is commonly called the “log-derivative trick” in ML (Fu, 2006; Kleijnen and Rubinstein, 1996): ∂ ∂θi 〈f(x)〉model = ∫ dx ∂pθ(x) ∂θi f(x) = 〈∂ log pθ(x) ∂θi f(x) 〉 model = 〈Oi(x)f(x)〉model ≈ ∑…”
- A Guide to Sample Average Approximation (2015, background): “If we take as given that SAA-appropriate problems are those for which both the approximating functions fn(·) and f(·) are differentiable, and the derivatives of fn(·) converge to those for f(·) then we arrive at an underlying theme of this section, which is the following “meta principle:” SAA-approp”