Evolution of gene‐for‐gene systems in metapopulations: the effect of spatial scale of host and pathogen dispersal

174 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Population mixing accelerates coevolution (2003, unknown): “Population mixing is predicted to purge genetic diversity in escalatory coevolutionary systems, as a result of directional selection for maximal investment into resistance and infectivity (Hochberg & van Baalen 1998; Damgaard 1999; Thrall & Burdon 2002 ).”
Dispersal, demography and spatial population models for conservation and control management (2008, background): “, 2002) or when plant diseases 40 spread through landscapes (Thrall and Burdon, 2002; Isard et al., 2005).”
Susceptibility to Fungal Pathogens of Forests Differing in Tree Diversity (2005, background): “Also, the specificity and aggressiveness of the pathogen, as well as its scale of dispersal and mode of action, are crucial elements for understanding disease impact in relation to host diversity and density (Strong and Levin 1975; Jeger 1999; Thrall and Burdon 2002).”
Large‐scale spatial dynamics of a specialist plant pathogen in a fragmented landscape (2006, background): “1996; Boots & Sasaki 1999; Roy & Kirchner 2000; Thrall & Burdon 2002; Hanski & Gaggiotti 2004).”