Comparison of finite element reliability methods
By Bruno Sudret, A. Der Kiureghian. 2002
244 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/25fbf6033e19ad4830434a11f4103a19f0871546
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- V. Dubourg
- B. Echard
- Nicolas Gayton
- Maurice Lemaire
- N. Relun
- Jean-Marc Bourinet
- Bruno Sudret
- Kai Cheng
Citations in the corpus
- A combined Importance Sampling and Kriging reliability method for small failure probabilities with time-demanding numerical models (2013, methodology): “Polynomial Chaos [11,12] can be used to avoid this problem.”
- Adaptive sparse polynomial chaos expansion based on least angle regression (2011, background): “Problem statement Let us study the problem of the settlement of a foundation on an elastic soil layer showing spatial variability in its material properties, already addressed in [31, 55].”
- Reliability-based design optimization using kriging surrogates and subset simulation (2011, background): “…polynomial response surfaces (Faravelli, 1989; Bucher and Bourgund, 1990; Kim and Na, 1997; Das and Zheng, 2000), polynomial chaos expansions (Sudret and Der Kiureghian, 2002; Berveiller et al., 2006; Blatman and Sudret, 2008, 2010), support vector machines (Hurtado, 2004; Deheeger, 2008;…”