Chemical and biological protection of grapevine propagation material from trunk disease pathogens

By P. Fourie, F. Halleen. European journal of plant pathology, 2006

92 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A critical review of plant protection tools for reducing pesticide use on grapevine and new perspectives for the implementation of IPM in viticulture (2017, background): “Available tools ready to be applied in the nursery include primarily the use of microbial biofungicides, in particular several Trichoderma species, which have already proved to be ef ﬁ cient against some of the main pathogens associated with GTDs (Fourie and Halleen, 2006; Pertot et al., 2016).”
Grapevine trunk diseases: complex and still poorly understood (2013, methodology): “…depends on several factors, such as themode and the number of applications on grapevines, the persistance of the product and the species of fungus treated (Di Marco & Osti, 2005; Halleen & Fourie, 2005; Sosnowski et al., 2005; Fourie & Halleen, 2006; Pitt et al., 2010;Rolshausen et al., 2010).”
Use of beneficial bacteria and their secondary metabolites to control grapevine pathogen diseases (2013, background): “This has been concentrated on beneficial fungi such as Trichoderma spp. strains (Fourie and Halleen 2006; Halleen et al. 2010; Kotze 2008), but beneficial bacteria have been studied as well.”