Gone but Not Forgotten? Invasive Plants' Legacies on Community and Ecosystem Properties

By Jeffrey D. Corbin, Carla M. D'Antonio. Invasive Plant Science and Management, 2012

209 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Towards a framework for understanding the context dependence of impacts of non‐native tree species (2020, background): “We define legacies as effects of non-native species that remain after the species has been removed through changes in soil biological, chemical or physical conditions and subsequent plant communities (Corbin & D'Antonio, 2012).”
Four priority areas to advance invasion science in the face of rapid environmental change (2020, background): “…be preceded by a predictive risk assessment of the indirect effects of invader removal (Bergstrom et al. 2009; Caut et al. 2009; Ruscoe et al. 2011; Lindenmayer et al. 2017) and the legacy effects of invasion (Corbin and D’Antonio 2012; Grove et al. 2015; Reynolds et al. 2017; Pickett et al. 2019).”
Aquatic invasive species: challenges for the future (2015, background): “''Legacy effects'' are effects of invasive species that persist after their removal (Corbin & D'Antonio, 2012) .”
When does invasive species removal lead to ecological recovery? Implications for management success (2018, background): “…invader may not alleviate impacts or may even have detrimental effects if they leave behind a legacy effect with long lasting impacts on ecosystems (Corbin and D’Antonio 2012), if they have replaced a functionally important native species (Zarnetske et al. 2010; Buckley and Han 2014), or if their…”