Are We Consistently Biased? Multidimensional Analysis of Biases in Distributional Word Vectors

By Anne Lauscher, Goran Glavas. 2019

58 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Word embeddings have recently been shown to reflect many of the pronounced societal biases (e.g., gender bias or racial bias). Existing studies are, however, limited in scope and do not investigate the consistency of biases across relevant dimensions like embedding models, types of texts, and different languages. In this work, we present a systematic study of biases encoded in distributional word vector spaces: we analyze how consistent the bias effects are across languages, corpora, and embedding models. Furthermore, we analyze the cross-lingual biases encoded in bilingual embedding spaces, indicative of the effects of bias transfer encompassed in cross-lingual transfer of NLP models. Our study yields some unexpected findings, e.g., that biases can be emphasized or downplayed by different embedding models or that user-generated content may be less biased than encyclopedic text. We hope our work catalyzes bias research in NLP and informs the development of bias reduction techniques.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Representation & Self-Supervised Learning, Safety, Robustness & Interpretability

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Yulia Tsvetkov
  2. Percy Liang
  3. Yejin Choi
  4. Ivan Vulic
  5. Noah A. Smith
  6. Mohit Bansal
  7. Dirk Hovy
  8. Kai-Wei Chang

In Representation & Self-Supervised Learning

  1. Ivan Vulic
  2. Percy Liang
  3. Goran Glavas
  4. Louis-philippe Morency
  5. Anne Lauscher
  6. Simone Paolo Ponzetto
  7. Dirk Hovy
  8. Hal Daumé Iii

In Safety, Robustness & Interpretability

  1. Yulia Tsvetkov
  2. Dirk Hovy
  3. Anne Lauscher
  4. Kai-Wei Chang
  5. Su Lin Blodgett
  6. Zeerak Talat
  7. Anjalie Field
  8. Federico Bianchi

Citations in the corpus