Linking impact assessment and sustainable development at the local level: the introduction of sustainability assessment systems

By D. Devuyst. 2000

132 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

What is Wrong with EIA and SEA anyway (2006, background): “…in terms of how outcomes can be achieved through impact assessment that is indeed economically, socially and environmentally sustainable (e.g. Lee and Kirkpatrick, 1997; Eggenberger and Partidario, 1999; Sadler, 1999; Devuyst, 1999, 2000 and 2001; Gibson, 2000; Dalal-Clayton and Sadler, 2005).”
Sustainability reporting among mining corporations: a constructive critique of the GRI approach (2014, background): “The value and sense-making power of those principles have been corroborated by their extensive application in sustainability studies (Becker, 2004; Bell and Morse, 2008; Bossel, 2001; Devuyst, 2000; Diesendorf, 2001; Dunphy et al., 2000; Geßner et al., 2001; Hodge et al., 1999; Kay, 2000; McCool and”
Review of sustainability indices and indicators: Towards a new City Sustainability Index (CSI) (2012, background): “…is to provide decision-makers with an evaluation of global and local integrated nature-society systems in short and long term perspectives in order to help them to judge which actions should or should not be taken in an attempt to make society sustainable (Devuyst, 2000; Ness et al., 2007).”
Categorising tools for sustainability assessment (2007, unknown): “Evolving from EIA in the 1990s, Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) is a tool for evaluating potential environmental impacts of strategic decisions (Partidario, 1999).”