Ruin theory revisited: stochastic models for operational risk
By Paul Embrechts, Gennady Samorodnitsky. 2002
62 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/25d380673272fe552eb5cad3a4febd6c27724c9a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Paul Embrechts
- V. Chavez‐Demoulin
- Johana Nešlehová
- P. D. Fontnouvelle
- H. Furrer
- Virginia DeJesus-Rueff
- R. Kaufmann
- J. Jordan
Citations in the corpus
- QUANTIFYING REGULATORY CAPITAL FOR OPERATIONAL RISK (2003, background): “(Strictly speaking, the latter property only holds for absolutely continuous loss distributions.)”
- Capital and Risk: New Evidence on Implications of Large Operational Losses (2006, background): “For further discussion of the LDA, readers should refer to Klugman et al. (1998) and Embrechts et al. (2002). basic components.”
- Operational Risk Quantification Using Extreme Value Theory and Copulas: From Theory to Practice (2009, unknown): “Specific conditions on the data are required to use EVT, which explains why it is still open to criticisms, discussed in Embrechts et al. (2003) and Embrechts et al. (2004).”
- Quantitative models for operational risk: Extremes, dependence and aggregation (2006, methodology): “Embrechts et al. (1997) detail the mathematical theory with a number of applications to insurance and finance. The edited volume Embrechts and editor (2000) contains an early summary of EVT applications to risk management, whereas McNeil et al.”