A comparison of pilot-aided channel estimation methods for OFDM systems

By Michele Morelli, Umberto Mengali. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2001

872 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Electrical and Electronic Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/25cc67d312fcc28c749766b23859bda0c8c36ee0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Networks and Communications

1. Lajos Hanzo
2. Geoffrey Y. Li
3. Shaoqian Li
4. Len Cimini
5. Z. Tan
6. Hongjie Hu
7. Yinsheng Liu
8. Chenyang Yang

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

1. Lajos Hanzo
2. Geoffrey Y. Li
3. Shaoqian Li
4. Chenyang Yang
5. Len Cimini
6. Z. Tan
7. Hongjie Hu
8. Yinsheng Liu

Citations in the corpus

• Physical Layer Security for Next Generation Wireless Networks: Theories, Technologies, and Challenges (2017, methodology): “the CSIs are obtained by classic channel estimation methods [195], [196].”
• OFDM and Its Wireless Applications: A Survey (2009, background): “PACE methods can reliably estimate channels both in static and time-varying channels by appropriately designing pilot patterns.”
• OFDM and MC-CDMA for Broadband Multi-User Communications, WLANs and Broadcasting (2003, methodology): “Morelli and Mengali [81] LS- and MMSE based channel transfer factor estimators were compared in the context of frequency-domain PSAM.”
• Channel Estimation for OFDM (2014, methodology): “Different interpolation techniques can be used to recover the channel responses at the data subcarriers [44], [55].”