Roost tree use by maternity colonies of Indiana bats and northern long-eared bats in southern Illinois

126 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Emergence time in forest bats: the influence of canopy closure (2007, background): “Forest succession dynamics should also be considered for long-term conservation of tree-dwelling bats (Jung et al., 2004; Carter and Feldhamer, 2005).”
White-nose syndrome is likely to extirpate the endangered Indiana bat over large parts of its range (2013, background): “, 2001), and loss of summer habitat resulting from the clearing of forest cover (Menzel et al., 2001; Carter and Feldhamer, 2005; Sparks et al., 2005).”
Roost tree selection by northern myotis (Myotis septentrionalis) maternity colonies following prescribed fire in a Central Appalachian Mountains hardwood forest (2009, methodology): “…per roost); Owen et al., 2002 (mean = 3.0 days per roost)), as well as in other parts of their range (Foster and Kurta, 1999 (mean = 5.6 tracking days and 3.6 roost trees); Cryan et al., 2001 (mean = 3.25 days per roost); Carter and Feldhamer, 2005 (mean = 3.9 tracking days and 2.5 roost trees)).”
Roost selection by male and female northern long-eared bats in a pine-dominated landscape (2007, background): “…selection by northern long-eared bats either combined sexes (e.g., Lacki and Schwierjohann, 2001) or conducted the study on a single sex (e.g., Sasse and Pekins, 1996; Foster and Kurta, 1999; Menzel et al., 2002; Owen et al., 2002; Jackson, 2004; Carter and Feldhamer, 2005; Ford et al., 2006).”