HybridSN: Exploring 3-D–2-D CNN Feature Hierarchy for Hyperspectral Image Classification

By Swalpa Kumar Roy, Gopal Krishna, Shiv Ram Dubey, Bidyut Baran Chaudhuri. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2019

1,500 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Hyperspectral image (HSI) classification is widely used for the analysis of remotely sensed images. Hyperspectral imagery includes varying bands of images. Convolutional neural network (CNN) is one of the most frequently used deep learning-based methods for visual data processing. The use of CNN for HSI classification is also visible in recent works. These approaches are mostly based on 2-D CNN. On the other hand, the HSI classification performance is highly dependent on both spatial and spectral information. Very few methods have used the 3-D-CNN because of increased computational complexity. This letter proposes a hybrid spectral CNN (HybridSN) for HSI classification. In general, the HybridSN is a spectral–spatial 3-D-CNN followed by spatial 2-D-CNN. The 3-D-CNN facilitates the joint spatial–spectral feature representation from a stack of spectral bands. The 2-D-CNN on top of the 3-D-CNN further learns more abstract-level spatial representation. Moreover, the use of hybrid CNNs reduces the complexity of the model compared to the use of 3-D-CNN alone. To test the performance of this hybrid approach, very rigorous HSI classification experiments are performed over Indian Pines, University of Pavia, and Salinas Scene remote sensing data sets. The results are compared with the state-of-the-art hand-crafted as well as end-to-end deep learning-based methods. A very satisfactory performance is obtained using the proposed HybridSN for HSI classification. The source code can be found at https://github.com/gokriznastic/HybridSN.

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Ecology, Media Technology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/25b9153473ae156113f6fd2dd9a28c2d2f104a8f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

  1. Antonio J. Plaza
  2. Swalpa Kumar Roy
  3. Jocelyn Chanussot
  4. Qian Du
  5. Danfeng Hong
  6. Zebin Wu
  7. Guangrui Zhao
  8. Yuhui Zheng

In Ecology

  1. Jocelyn Chanussot
  2. Qian Du
  3. Swalpa Kumar Roy
  4. Jing Yao
  5. Danfeng Hong
  6. Lorenzo Bruzzone
  7. Antonio J. Plaza
  8. Jingxiang Yang

In Media Technology

  1. Antonio J. Plaza
  2. Jocelyn Chanussot
  3. Swalpa Kumar Roy
  4. Danfeng Hong
  5. Qian Du
  6. Jing Yao
  7. Juan Mario Haut
  8. Jon Atli Benediktsson

Citations in the corpus