Last chance for carbon capture and storage

By S. Gilfillan, Nils Markusson, H. Chalmers. 2013

360 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Environmental Engineering, Global and Planetary Change, Mechanical Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/259bd03b8f5407a5a63ba705dbaa8a197fefacac

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Environmental Engineering

In Global and Planetary Change

In Mechanical Engineering

Citations in the corpus

Expert assessment concludes negative emissions scenarios may not deliver (2016, background): “BECCS is predicated on the existence of a CCS infrastructure, which is in turn dependent on policy and institutional support, which are by no means assured (Scott et al 2013, Lomax et al 2015) and are much more challenging to parameterise than the technical aspects of establishing the technology.”
Economic-Emission Dispatch Problem in Power Systems With Carbon Capture Power Plants (2021, background): “According to [5], by 2035 the coal-fired plants will be still the major source of electric power generation and CCS will result in 8 GTon of CO2 emission reduction by 2050.”
Post-combustion CO2 capture using mesoporous TiO2/graphene oxide nanocomposites (2015, background): “of solid fuel); and oxyfuel combustion systems (adjusting the combustion conditions to generate flue gas with easily separable CO2) [2].”
Economic growth and development with low‐carbon energy (2017, background): “CCS technology could mitigate the effects on global fossil fuel demand to some extent, but would not fundamentally alter the fact that decarbonization means substantially less demand for fossil fuels, especially in light of slow progress with the technology.(59) The prospect of fossil fuels losing t”
Fossil fuel depletion and socio-economic scenarios: An integrated approach (2014, background): “Other technologies such as CCS are not considered in this study due to their uncertain development and benefits (Fischedick et al., 2008; Scott et al., 2013). each scenario13, and then their quantification.”
Buffering Volatility: A Study on the Limits of Germany's Energy Revolution (2017, neutral): “This is less than a tenth 65 Cf. IEA (2016), Scott et al. (2013), Koelbl et al. (2014) and Sinn (2012 , pp. 53–60).”
A review of pumped hydro energy storage development in significant international electricity markets (2016, background): “On the other hand, CCS technologies have so far failed to gain any meaningful levels of deployment, despite significant research and development [11].”