Agreements, rules and agentic fidelity in polyamorous relationships

By Kassia Wosick-Correa. 2010

114 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2581807bdeaf45e81e6508f6ed3c09e81d4df0e3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Jes L. Matsick
2. A. Moors
3. H. Schechinger

In Social Psychology

1. Jes L. Matsick
2. A. Moors
3. H. Schechinger

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Jes L. Matsick
2. A. Moors
3. H. Schechinger

Citations in the corpus

• Unique and shared relationship benefits of consensually non-monogamous and monogamous relationships: A review and insights for moving forward. (2017, methodology): “…the same time, other researchers (albeit small samples sizes often acquired with targeted CNM recruitment techniques) have noted that people engaged in CNM (in particular, polyamory) tend to be upper-class, white, and highly educated (e.g., Klesse, 2014; Sheff & Hammers, 2011; Wosick-Correa, 2010).”