Understanding social acceptance of electricity generation sources

203 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Contextual and psychological factors shaping evaluations and acceptability of energy alternatives: Integrated review and research agenda (2014, background): “…þ – – – Boudet et al. (2014) [44] US 1061 Hydraulic fracturing for oil and gas Quantitative þ (Respondents reported the first things that come to mind when thinking of “fracking”) – þ Spatial proximity þ Worldviews Bronfman et al. (2012) [24] Chile 243 Renewable energy sources, fossil fuels,…”
Individual Factors Influencing Acceptability for Environmental Policies: A Review and Research Agenda (2020, background): “However, when studied in relation to renewable energy policies, specific trust is not related to risk evaluation and subsequent acceptability [56], possibly because policies on nuclear power involve a higher degree of uncertainty and thus require a higher level of trust.”
Evaluating the public perceptions of nuclear power in China: Evidence from a contingent valuation survey (2014, background): “Bronfman et al. (2012) validated a causal trust-acceptability model for electricity generation sources and the model showed that social acceptance of an energy source was directly caused by the perceived risk and social trust in regulatory agencies.”