A comparative study of impulse-resistant metal sandwich plates
By Zhenyu Xue, J. W. Hutchinson. 2004
572 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Civil and Structural Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Mechanics of Materials
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/256f00373ac44c30b4c7aaf14cf6afb0eb2b353e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Civil and Structural Engineering
In Mechanical Engineering
In Mechanics of Materials
Citations in the corpus
- The response of clamped sandwich beams subjected to shock loading (2006, background): “There exists an increasing body of theoretical work to suggest that sandwich structures outperform monolithic structures for shock loading, particularly for underwater shocks, see for example Fleck and Deshpande [2], Xue and Hutchinson [ 3 ] and Qiu et al. [4,5].”
- An underwater shock simulator (2006, background): “Their finite element (FE) calculations suggest that the benefits of sandwich construction for shock mitigation applications might be overestimated by the analysis of Fleck & Deshpande (2004) and Xue & Hutchinson (2004) .”
- Multifunctional periodic cellular metals (2006, methodology): “A schematic illustration of the concept is shown in figure 20. Detailed finite element calculations using fully meshed geometries with square honeycomb, prismatic corrugations and pyramidal truss topologies made from materials defined by their yield strength, strain hardening rate, and strain rate s”
- Performance of metallic honeycomb-core sandwich beams under shock loading (2006, background): “Recent analyses of clamped beams and plates subject to spatially uniform impulses (Fleck and Deshpande, 2004; Qiu et al., 2003; Xue and Hutchinson, 2004) have provided the following insights and implications (Fig.”
- Structural performance of near-optimal sandwich panels with corrugated cores (2006, background): “2005; Vaughn et al., 2005; Xue and Hutchinson, 2003, 2004; Rathbun et al., in press) and, in some cases, efficient active cooling (Valdevit et al., 2004; Lu et al., 2005).”
- A blast-tolerant sandwich plate design with a polyurea interlayer (2006, background): “So far, finite element solutions of sandwich plates subjected to blast loading have been obtained for simple geometries and boundary conditions, such as clamped circular plates, and uniform pressure impulses (Xue and Hutchinson, 2003, 2004; Qui et al., 2003).”
- Plastic Deformation, Failure and Energy Absorption of Sandwich Structures with Metallic Cellular Cores (2010, methodology): “DIMENSIONLESS ANALYSES Dimensionless analyses were conducted by Xue and Hutchinson [139–141] to investigate the performance of monolithic and sandwich plates subject to air and water impulses.”
- Metal sandwich plates optimized for pressure impulses (2005, background): “This appears to be a good assumption for large-scale plates (in-plane dimension on the order of a meter) with relatively strong cores that are subject to loadings characteristic of air and water pulses with t0 10 4 s [4,5,7].”
- The response of clamped sandwich plates with metallic foam cores to simulated blast loading (2006, methodology): “They have demonstrated the accuracy of their analytical model in the case of no fluid-structure interaction by direct comparison with the finite element calculations of Xue and Hutchinson (2004) for clamped sandwich beams.”
- Impact Mechanics and High-Energy Absorbing Materials: Review (2008, background): “Xue and Hutchinson (2004) study blast resistant metal sandwich plates and compare the effect of different truss structures on impact resistance.”
- The impulsive response of sandwich beams: analytical and numerical investigation of regimes of behaviour (2006, background): “Several recent studies have shown that sandwich structures subjected to blast loading outperform monolithic structures of equal mass, see for example, Fleck and Deshpande (2004) and Xue and Hutchinson (2004) .”