Guidelines for National Indicators of Subjective Well-Being and Ill-Being

By E. Diener. 2006

853 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Health, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/253b7ac6a938ecfc35a8a8c27fd4758f721f57b0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

In Health

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Why Income Inequality Is Dissatisfying—Perceptions of Social Status and the Inequality-Satisfaction Link in Europe (2019, background): “At the same time, subjective well-being is often described as the ultimate objective of human behaviour and welfare and is thus of socio-political importance (Kahneman et al., 2004; Diener, 2006; Stiglitz, Sen and Fitoussi, 2009).”
Happiness and public choice (2010, methodology): “…has designed several indicators of subjective well-being, relying on different measurement techniques (for a discussion, see Kahneman et al. 1999; Diener 2005; Kahneman and Krueger 2006): global evaluations of individual life satisfaction, based on representative surveys; the Experience Sampling…”
Pursuit of pleasure, engagement, and meaning: Relationships to subjective and objective measures of well-being (2010, neutral): “Measures of SWB, such as life satisfaction, happiness, and positive affect have different methodological limitations and so should be teased apart (Diener, 2006).”
Measuring Well-being Across Europe: Description of the ESS Well-being Module and Preliminary Findings (2009, background): “Nevertheless, there is a consensus that the measurement of well-being is important and should be undertaken in major surveys, all the while recognising that this is an emerging science (Diener, 2006).”
Cognitive, affective and contextual predictors of subjective wellbeing (2012, methodology): “The concept of SWB can be assessed through different dimensions – cognitive and affective – and different levels of analysis – global and specific – depending on the instruments used; see Table 1 (Diener, 2006; Sirgy, 2002).”
A Concept Analysis of Person-Centered Care (2012, background): “Diener (2005) describes well-being as how a person evaluates his or her life, including both the positive and negative experiences.”
Measuring Social Sustainability: A Community-Centred Approach (2012, background): “The first of these relates to what is measured by indicators—whether they measure objective conditions of a community, or to those conditions as subjectively experienced by its members (Diener 2006; McCrea et al. 2006).”
Bullying and health at work: The mediating roles of psychological capital and social support (2014, background): “Diener (2006) describes them as “umbrella terms” and says they include “reflective cognitive evaluations, such as life satisfaction and work satisfaction, interest and engagement, and affective reactions to life events, such as joy and sadness” (p. 153).”
Distilling the Outcomes of Personal Experiences: A Propensity-scored Analysis of Social Media (2017, background): “For instance, learning about the concerns (and their likelihood) of people having a pension within a given time period is not only informative for individuals, but it is also an important source of information for policy-makers [29].”
A review of air pollution impact on subjective well-being: Survey versus visual psychophysics (2018, neutral): “A definition given by Diener et al. (2006) is commonly identified by research in this field, which is ‘Good mental states, including all of the various evaluations, positive and negative, that people make of their lives and the affective reactions of people to their experiences.’”