The political ecology of war: natural resources and armed conflicts
By Philippe Le Billon. 2001
1,456 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/253042275a9fed317dc7146c04c8998e9029ff9c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- G. Hilson
- A. Rosser
- R. Maconachie
- Richard Snyder
- T. Dunning
- Ilgaz Arikan
- Macartan Humphreys
- C. Simmons
In Sociology and Political Science
- G. Hilson
- A. Rosser
- R. Maconachie
- Richard Snyder
- T. Dunning
- Ilgaz Arikan
- Macartan Humphreys
- C. Simmons
Citations in the corpus
- “GOOD GOVERNANCE” AND THE EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA (2008, background): “Ross ( 2004a , 2004b), on the other hand, observes that lootable resources could make conflict so profitable that one or more combatants lose their incentive to reach a peace settlement, views that are reinforced by le Billon ( 2001b , 2006).”
- The political economy of the resource curse : a literature survey (2006, background): “Le Billon (2001), for instance, has distinguished between four different types of natural resource: point source resources that are close to the capital; point source resources that are distant from the capital; diffuse resources that are close to the capital; and diffuse resources that are distant ”