Dr. Pangloss restrained by the Red Queen : steps towards a unified defence theory
By J. Jokela, P. Schmid-Hempel, M. Rigby. 2000
161 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/252e3dc42f1b29e1fa3cae506ff09e629f7432f2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Andrew M Stoehr
- Andrea L. Graham
- P. Schmid-Hempel
- J. Allen
- Andrew F. Read
- M. Zuk
- Hanna Kokko
- M. Rantala
In Genetics
- Andrew M Stoehr
- Andrea L. Graham
- M. Zuk
- J. Allen
- Andrew F. Read
- P. Schmid-Hempel
- Hanna Kokko
- M. Rantala
Citations in the corpus
- Evolutionary Causes and Consequences of Immunopathology (2005, background): “Integration of the influences of the efficacy and specificity of responses is certainly an important step toward a “unified defense theory” (Jokela et al. 2000), but evolutionary studies as yet largely omit investigation of immune response efficacy.”
- Immune Defense and Host Life History (2002, background): “These two aspects of costs (diversity of parasites being most related to option costs, elimination of parasites being resource costly) are addressed in a model by Jokela et al. (2000).”
- Variation in immune defence as a question of evolutionary ecology (2003, background): “Remarkably few attempts have been made to integrate these two major sources of variation in immune response, i.e. costly trade-offs and specificity, into a common framework (Frank 2000; Jokela et al. 2000).”