Temperature dependence and temperature limits of magnetic shape memory effect

By O. Heczko, L. Straka. 2003

153 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Materials Chemistry, Paleontology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/252caead5b8adc87f1f624d5b4dab6315faa96e8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials

1. Christian Lexcellent
2. Y. Ge
3. O. Söderberg
4. S. Hannula
5. A. Sozinov
6. V. Lindroos

In Materials Chemistry

1. Christian Lexcellent
2. Martin Leary
3. Aleksandar Subic
4. Y. Ge
5. O. Söderberg
6. M. Gibson
7. S. Hannula
8. A. Sozinov

In Paleontology

1. Christian Lexcellent
2. A. Sozinov

Citations in the corpus

• Shape-Memory Alloys Handbook (2013, methodology): “In addition, as previously indicated, πcr(T) is a function of the temperature, as shown for conventional SMAs by Brinson [BRI 93] and by Heczko and Straka [HEC 03] for magnetic SMAs.”
• Recent breakthrough development of the magnetic shape memory effect in Ni–Mn–Ga alloys (2005, background): “The value of the twinning stress is also reduced with increasing temperature [16, 17, 48, 67, 103, 124], but in the T structure the minimum stress level still remains around 6 MPa.”
• A review of shape memory alloy research, applications and opportunities (2014, background): “Furthermore, MSMAs are very brittle, stiff and only operable at low temperature [166,169,170].”