Cost development of future technologies for power generation--A study based on experience curves and complementary bottom-up assessments

387 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Interim monitoring of cost dynamics for publicly supported energy technologies (2009, methodology): “Comparisons of such bottom-up models with experience curves and expert opinion provide a method that is more robust to bias within any single method (Neij, 2008).”
Energy [R]evolution 2010—a sustainable world energy outlook (2011, background): “Feasibility of renewable growth rates Assumed growth rates for renewable energy technology de-7 IMF 2009, world GDP 2009 (ppp): US$ 70.21 trillion. ployment are important drivers (Neij 2008).”
Historical construction costs of global nuclear power reactors (2016, positive): “These results have played a role in in-forming integrated assessment modellers and policy makers (Neij, 2008; Junginger et al., 2008; Harris et al., 2013; Azevedo et al., 2013).”
Carbon Lock-Out: Advancing Renewable Energy Policy in Europe (2012, background): “Over the last decade, learning effects have led to significant cost decreases of RES-E technologies such as wind, photovoltaics or concentrated solar power [18–20].”