Conducting polymers-based electrochemical supercapacitors—Progress and prospects
By R. Ramya, R. Sivasubramanian, M. Sangaranarayanan. 2013
401 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Polymers and Plastics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2525be8d216ff19218154c369a16e091753fbdfe
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Biomedical Engineering
In Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
- H. Zanin
- Cássio M.R. Moreira
- Lindomar G. De Souza
- B. Pires
- R. Cesar
- L. M. da Silva
- Willian G. Nunes
- Rafael Vicentini
In Polymers and Plastics
- H. Zanin
- Cássio M.R. Moreira
- Lindomar G. De Souza
- B. Pires
- R. Cesar
- L. M. da Silva
- Willian G. Nunes
- Rafael Vicentini
Citations in the corpus
- Reviewing the fundamentals of supercapacitors and the difficulties involving the analysis of the electrochemical findings obtained for porous electrode materials (2020, methodology): “Despite these considerations, in several different reports [115, 343 – 346] [347 – 349,352], the impedance response of EDLCs was incorrectly represented by EC models containing the W -element.”
- Graphene‐based ternary composites for supercapacitors (2018, background): “Basically, there are 2 types of doping, ie, p‐doping (oxidative doping), which involves the release of π‐electrons, and n‐doping, which produces net negative charges.(21) Poly(3,4‐ethylenedioxythiophene) can undergo both p‐ doping and n‐doping, while PANI and PPy only undergo p‐doping as their n‐dop”