Carbohydrates for training and competition
By L. Burke, J. Hawley, S. Wong, A. Jeukendrup. Jurnal sport science, 2011
930 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cell Biology, Physiology, Rehabilitation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/251f6866f8f77ca236cdeed7fbd24f66342228cb
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Physiology
Citations in the corpus
- Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, Dietitians of Canada, and the American College of Sports Medicine: Nutrition and Athletic Performance. (2016, background): “As long as total intake of carbohydrate and energy is adequate and overall nutritional goals are met, meals and snacks can be chosen from a variety of foods and fluids according to personal preferences of type and timing of intake.(36,117) More research is needed to investigate how glycogen storage ”
- International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: protein and exercise (2017, background): “This finding is not surprising given that dietary protein is not a preferred energy source and the dietary carbohydrate intakes in the higher protein treatment were below recommended intakes for endurance athletes (6–10 g of carbohydrate/kg/d) [3].”
- American College of Sports Medicine Joint Position Statement. Nutrition and Athletic Performance. (2016, positive): “Robust literature on exercise carbohydrate feeding has led to the recognition that different amounts, timing and types of carbohydrate are needed to achieve these different effects, and that the different effects may overlap in various events.(36,125) Table 2 summarizes the current guidelines for ex”
- Consensus Recommendations on Training and Competing in the Heat (2015, positive): “The preferred method of rehydration is through the consumption of fluids with foods (e.g., including salty food).”
- Exercise management in type 1 diabetes: a consensus statement. (2017, neutral): “(63,111,112) and on the expert opinion of the authors.”