Ki67 in breast cancer: prognostic and predictive potential.
By R. Yerushalmi, R. Woods, P. Ravdin, M. Hayes, K. Gelmon. The Lancet Oncology, 2010
1,207 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cancer Research, Oncology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/250b71c22630252ff0791915dc6036a6c5c9b483
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cancer Research
- Mitchell Dowsett
- M. Klinkhammer-Schalke
- S. Leung
- M. Koller
- E. Inwald
- O. Ortmann
- M. Gerstenhauer
- Torsten O. Nielsen
In Oncology
Citations in the corpus
- Use of Biomarkers to Guide Decisions on Adjuvant Systemic Therapy for Women With Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. (2016, background): “analysis lacks reproducibility across laboratories and, therefore, cannot be consistently interpreted when performed in a broad range of laboratories.(71-75) IHC for Ki-67 is not recommended for broad clinical use to determine whether a patient should receive chemotherapy.”
- Assessment of Ki67 in Breast Cancer: Updated Recommendations From the International Ki67 in Breast Cancer Working Group (2020, background): “patients, the intrinsic subtypes of the cancers, and application of therapies have been mixed or often not even reported (67).”
- Ki-67 is a prognostic parameter in breast cancer patients: results of a large population-based cohort of a cancer registry (2013, background): “However, to date no standard operating procedure (SOP) or generally accepted cut-off definition for Ki-67 exists [12, 13].”
- Ki67 is a promising molecular target in the diagnosis of cancer (review). (2015, background): “as a prognostic marker over mitotic rate (97-100).”
- An overview of triple-negative breast cancer (2016, background): “and in patients treated with antihormonal therapy [85], and some of its effect on the outcome appears to be unrelated to”