Characterization of crystalline cellulose in biomass: Basic principles, applications, and limitations of XRD, NMR, IR, Raman, and SFG

By Seong H. Kim, Christopher M. Lee, K. Kafle. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2013

194 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomaterials, Biomedical Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2508f9f8ae69c9e20dceeaab980a0a161b913e7e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomaterials

1. I. Kontro
2. Orlando J. Rojas
3. Kirsi Svedström
4. Patrik Ahvenainen
5. A. Dufresne

In Biomedical Engineering

1. I. Kontro
2. Orlando J. Rojas
3. Kirsi Svedström
4. Patrik Ahvenainen

Citations in the corpus

• Comparison of sample crystallinity determination methods by X-ray diffraction for challenging cellulose I materials (2016, methodology): “NMR yields information on the physical and chemical environment of individual atoms whereas XRD is sensitive to long-range order.”
• Cellulose Chemistry and Properties: Fibers, Nanocelluloses and Advanced Materials (2016, background): “Progress has been made by electron microscopy of individual cellulose microcrystals, resulting in the unambiguous identification of two distinct crystal phases corresponding to cellulose Iα and Iβ [24].”