On the Consistency of Ordinal Regression Methods
By Fabian Pedregosa, Francis R. Bach, Alexandre Gramfort. 2014
83 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Many of the ordinal regression models that have been proposed in the literature can be seen as methods that minimize a convex surrogate of the zero-one, absolute, or squared loss functions. A key property that allows to study the statistical implications of such approximations is that of Fisher consistency. Fisher consistency is a desirable property for surrogate loss functions and implies that in the population setting, i.e., if the probability distribution that generates the data were available, then optimization of the surrogate would yield the best possible model. In this paper we will characterize the Fisher consistency of a rich family of surrogate loss functions used in the context of ordinal regression, including support vector ordinal regression, ORBoosting and least absolute deviation. We will see that, for a family of surrogate loss functions that subsumes support vector ordinal regression and ORBoosting, consistency can be fully characterized by the derivative of a real-valued function at zero, as happens for convex margin-based surrogates in binary classification. We also derive excess risk bounds for a surrogate of the absolute error that generalize existing risk bounds for binary classification. Finally, our analysis suggests a novel surrogate of the squared error loss. We compare this novel surrogate with competing approaches on 9 different datasets. Our method shows to be highly competitive in practice, outperforming the least squares loss on 7 out of 9 datasets.
Subfields: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Statistics and Probability, Optimization & Training
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Simon Lacoste-Julien
- Mehryar Mohri
- Anton Osokin
- Francis R. Bach
- Ivan Laptev
- Cordelia Schmid
- Luc Van Gool
- Anqi Mao
In Statistics and Probability
- Simon Lacoste-Julien
- Anton Osokin
- Francis R. Bach
- Mehryar Mohri
- Julien Mairal
- Kenji Fukumizu
- Arthur Gretton
- Rodolphe Jenatton
In Optimization & Training
- Simon Lacoste-Julien
- Francis R. Bach
- Peter Richtárik
- Mehryar Mohri
- Anton Osokin
- Kirill Struminsky
- Nicolas Loizou
- Sebastian U. Stich
Citations in the corpus
- Quantifying Learning Guarantees for Convex but Inconsistent Surrogates (2018, background): “Consistency of convex surrogates has been the central question of many studies for such problems as binary classification [2, 24, 19], multi-class classification [23, 21, 1, 17], ranking [11, 4, 5, 18, 15] and, more recently, structured prediction [7, 14].”
- On Structured Prediction Theory with Calibrated Convex Surrogate Losses (2017, background): “A large body of work specifically focuses on the related tasks of ranking [18, 9, 40] and ordinal regression [37].”
- Cross-Entropy Loss Functions: Theoretical Analysis and Applications (2023, background): “…classification (Pires et al., 2013; Pires & Szepesvári, 2016), structured prediction (Ciliberto et al., 2016; Osokin et al., 2017; Blondel, 2019), top-k classification (Thilagar et al., 2022), structured abstain problem (Nueve et al., 2022) and ordinal regression (Pedregosa et al., 2017).”