Toxicity of nanomaterials

By Shahriar Sharifi, Shahed Behzadi, S. Laurent, M. Forrest, P. Stroeve, Morteza Mahmoudi. Chemical Society Reviews, 2011

915 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Nanoscience has matured significantly during the last decade as it has transitioned from bench top science to applied technology. Presently, nanomaterials are used in a wide variety of commercial products such as electronic components, sports equipment, sun creams and biomedical applications. There are few studies of the long-term consequences of nanoparticles on human health, but governmental agencies, including the United States National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health and Japan’s Ministry of Health, have recently raised the question of whether seemingly innocuous materials such as carbon-based nanotubes should be treated with the same caution afforded known carcinogens such as asbestos. Since nanomaterials are increasing a part of everyday consumer products, manufacturing processes, and medical products, it is imperative that both workers and end-users be protected from inhalation of potentially toxic NPs. It also suggests that NPs may need to be sequestered into products so that the NPs are not released into the atmosphere during the product’s life or during recycling. Further, non-inhalation routes of NP absorption, including dermal and medical injectables, must be studied in order to understand possible toxic effects. Fewer studies to date have addressed whether the body can eventually eliminate nanomaterials to prevent particle build-up in tissues or organs. This critical review discusses the biophysicochemical properties of various nanomaterials with emphasis on currently available toxicology data and methodologies for evaluating nanoparticle toxicity.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Materials Chemistry

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/24d676438f9093462b4f234d737dbfdeaecd02a0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

  1. I. Torres-Pacheco
  2. Marcela Vargas-Hernández
  3. S. D. J. Rivero-Montejo

Citations in the corpus