TempQuestions: A Benchmark for Temporal Question Answering

By Jia Zhen, Abdalghani Abujabal, Rishiraj Saha Roy, Jannik Strotgen, Gerhard Weikum. 2018

135 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Answering complex questions is one of the challenges that question-answering (QA) systems face today. While complexity has several facets, question dimensions like temporal and spatial intents necessitate specialized treatment. Methods geared towards such questions need benchmarks that reflect the desired aspects and challenges. Here, we take a key step in this direction, and release a new benchmark, TempQuestions, containing 1,271 questions, that are all temporal in nature, paired with their answers. As a key contribution that enabled the creation of this resource, we provide a crisp definition for temporal questions. Most questions require decomposing them into sub-questions, and the questions are of a kind that they would be best evaluated on a combination of structured data and unstructured text sources. Experiments with two QA systems demonstrate the need for further research on complex questions.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Evaluation & Benchmarks, Question Answering & Reading Comprehension

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Yejin Choi
  2. Xiang Ren
  3. Noah A. Smith
  4. Mohit Bansal
  5. Hannaneh Hajishirzi
  6. Luke S. Zettlemoyer
  7. Ronan Le Bras
  8. Dan Roth

In Evaluation & Benchmarks

  1. Yejin Choi
  2. Ronan Le Bras
  3. Xiang Ren
  4. Jungo Kasai
  5. Noah A. Smith
  6. Dan Roth
  7. Keisuke Sakaguchi
  8. Kentaro Inui

In Question Answering & Reading Comprehension

  1. Soumen Chakrabarti
  2. Partha P. Talukdar
  3. Apoorv Saxena
  4. Xiang Ren
  5. Dan Roth
  6. Yejin Choi
  7. Keisuke Sakaguchi
  8. Kentaro Inui

Citations in the corpus