Advances in molecular marker techniques and their applications in plant sciences
By Milee Agarwal, Neeta Shrivastava, H. Padh. Plant Cell Reports, 2008
961 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Genetics, Molecular Biology, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/24c34554b31f4123eb80e31752a76b0288ffb1ef
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Genetics
In Molecular Biology
In Plant Science
Citations in the corpus
- Resistance to rice sheath blight (Rhizoctonia solani Kühn) [(teleomorph: Thanatephorus cucumeris (A.B. Frank) Donk.] disease: current status and perspectives (2011, positive): “Molecular markers, mapping populations, and mapping approaches used The past decades have seen the development of a range of DNA markers and their application in crop improvement programmes (for reviews, see Agarwal et al. 2008; Jones et al. 2009; Thomson et al. 2010; Varshney 2010).”
- DNA molecular markers in plant breeding: current status and recent advancements in genomic selection and genome editing (2018, methodology): “SCAR markers are more specific and more reproducible as compared to RAPD [77].”
- Genome Editing of Plants (2017, background): “Example review articles on the history of DNA fingerprinting in plants include Agarwal et al. (2008) and Nybom et al. (2014).”
- The Application of Biotechnology to Orchids (2013, background): “…the limitations of reproducibility associated with RAPD and ingeniously combines the power of RFLP and the flexibility of PCR-based technology (Agarwal et al., 2008) to provide a novel and very powerful DNA fingerprinting technique for DNAs of any origin or complexity. cDNA AFLP and three…”
- Molecular markers and their applications in cattle genetic research: A review (2014, background): “They have characteristic biological properties that can be detected and measured in any parts of the body such as the blood or tissue at any stage(11,12) and they are not confounded by environment, pleiotropic, or epistatic effects.(13)”
- Somaclonal variation in plants: causes and detection methods (2011, methodology): “…becoming more popular due to their co-dominant inheritance nature, high abundance in organisms, enormous extent of allelic diversity as well as the ease of assessing microsatellite size variation using PCR with pairs of flanking primers (Li et al. 2002; Weising et al. 2005; Agarwal et al. 2008).”
- Marker-Assisted Plant Breeding: Principles and Practices (2015, methodology): “The RBIP approach is designed to detect retrotransposon insertions at specific sites using PCR amplification (Agarwal et al. 2008).”
- Genetic dissection of aroma volatile compounds from the essential oil of peach fruit: QTL analysis and identification of candidate genes using dense SNP maps (2013, methodology): “Improved genotyping capacity (Agarwal et al. 2008) and VOC quantification methods (Tholl and Rose 2006) are now enabling the application of quantitative trait loci (QTL) analysis to aroma components.”
- Exploitation of SSR, SRAP and CAPS-SNP markers for genetic diversity of Citrus germplasm collection (2011, background): “Rather, the result of SRAPmarkerswas amoderate number of co-dominant markers (Agarwal et al., 2008).”
- In vitro propagation of the endangered plant Centaurea ultreiae: assessment of genetic stability by cytological studies, flow cytometry and RAPD analysis (2010, background): “There are several DNA markers available (Agarwal et al. 2008), but RAPD offers the advantage of being simpler to use, less expensive and less time-consuming (Lanham and Brenner 1999; Lowe et al. 1996), which is particularly important when the work involves non-economically important species, for…”