Is the deconvolution layer the same as a convolutional layer?

By Wenzhe Shi, Jose Caballero, Lucas Theis, Ferenc Huszár, Andrew P. Aitken, Christian Ledig, Zehan Wang. 2016

148 citations recorded by the source corpus.

In this note, we want to focus on aspects related to two questions most people asked us at CVPR about the network we presented. Firstly, What is the relationship between our proposed layer and the deconvolution layer? And secondly, why are convolutions in low-resolution (LR) space a better choice? These are key questions we tried to answer in the paper, but we were not able to go into as much depth and clarity as we would have liked in the space allowance. To better answer these questions in this note, we first discuss the relationships between the deconvolution layer in the forms of the transposed convolution layer, the sub-pixel convolutional layer and our efficient sub-pixel convolutional layer. We will refer to our efficient sub-pixel convolutional layer as a convolutional layer in LR space to distinguish it from the common sub-pixel convolutional layer. We will then show that for a fixed computational budget and complexity, a network with convolutions exclusively in LR space has more representation power at the same speed than a network that first upsamples the input in high resolution space.

Subfields: Computational Mechanics, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computational Mechanics

  1. Eirikur Agustsson
  2. Michael Tschannen
  3. Radu Timofte
  4. Luc Van Gool
  5. Yapeng Tian
  6. Salman Hameed Khan
  7. Nick Barnes
  8. Jing-Hao Xue

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

  1. Radu Timofte
  2. Luc Van Gool
  3. Eirikur Agustsson
  4. Salman Hameed Khan
  5. Michael Tschannen
  6. Ming-Hsuan Yang
  7. Nick Barnes
  8. Fabian Mentzer

Citations in the corpus