Perceiving affect from the voice and the face

By Dominic W. Massaro, Peter B. Egan. 1996

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Assessing the Role of the ‘Unity Assumption’ on Multisensory Integration: A Review (2017, background): “Integrating visual and auditory emotion signals, as compared to speech perception, has received far less attention in studies of multisensory perception (e.g., Massaro and Egan, 1996; de Gelder and Vroomen, 2000; Vroomen et al., 2001; Föcker et al., 2011; Maiworm et al., 2012).”
Preattentive processing of audio-visual emotional signals. (2011, unknown): “This hypothesis is supported by studies demonstrating that emotional binding is independent of whether or not participants attend to the auditory, visual or both sensory streams (de Gelder & Vroomen, 2000; Massaro & Egan, 1996; Massaro, 1998).”
Audiovisual integration of emotional signals from music improvisation does not depend on temporal correspondence. (2010, methodology): “…Campanella and Belin, 2007), showing that under normal conditions the visual information dominates the auditorywhen judging an emotion (Collignon et al., 2008), and that the two affective signals are integrated even when emotionally discordant (Massaro and Egan, 1996; De Gelder and Vroomen, 2000).”
Multisensory perception of the six basic emotions is modulated by attentional instruction and unattended modality (2015, background): “These results are in line with previous studies showing that the emotion perception improves when more than one source of congruent information about the intended emotion is available (Massaro and Egan, 1996; de Gelder and Vroomen, 2000; Pell, 2002; Collignon et al., 2008).”
Audiovisual prosody and feeling of knowing (2005, background): “Interestingly, various more recent studies have shown that both modalities inXuence emotion perception of incongruent stimuli, where the visual channel may oVer one emotion (‘happy’) and the auditory channel another (‘sad’) (e.g., de Gelder & Vroomen, 2000; Massaro & Egan, 1996).”
Is there an advantage for recognizing multi-modal emotional stimuli? (2011, background): “Our results align with other data which show that emotional judgements tend to improve when more than one source of congruent information about the intended emotion is available (e.g., Collignon et al. 2008; DeGelder and Vroomen 2000; Massaro and Egan 1996; Pell 2005).”
Relationships among Facial, Prosodic, and Lexical Channels of Emotional Perceptual Processing (2000, background): “Three studies involving perception that have addressed this issue with normals also reported an association between the facial and prosodic channels (Borod et al., 1990; Massaro & Egan, 1996; Williams & Sundene, 1965).”
Is cross-modal integration of emotional expressions independent of attentional resources? (2001, background): “This cross-modal bias was present even when subjects were told to ignore the face and concentrate on the heard voice only (see also Massaro & Egan, 1996 ).”
The perception of emotions by ear and by eye (2000, background): “Although the question addressed in this experiment is close to the one asked by Massaro and Egan (1996) , the experimental situation differed from theirs on several potentially important aspects.”
Audiovisual integration of emotional signals in voice and face: An event-related fMRI study (2007, background): “For instance, the perception of a facial expression can be altered by accompanying emotional prosody (Ethofer et al., 2006a; Massaro and Egan, 1996).”