Learning to Detect Ground Control Points for Improving the Accuracy of Stereo Matching
By Aristotle Spyropoulos, Nikos Komodakis, Philippos Mordohai. 2014
123 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Media Technology
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Raquel Urtasun
- Mohammed Bennamoun
- Luc Van Gool
- Dacheng Tao
- Xiaogang Wang
- Alexander Gerhard Schwing
- Andreas Geiger
- Ming-Hsuan Yang
In Media Technology
- Raquel Urtasun
- Yann LeCun
- Stefano Mattoccia
- Fabio Tosi
- K. Sohn
- Hujun Bao
- Mohammed Bennamoun
- Alexander Gerhard Schwing
Citations in the corpus
- Stereo Matching by Training a Convolutional Neural Network to Compare Image Patches (2015, background): “Recent work (Haeusler et al., 2013; Spyropoulos et al., 2014) focused on estimating the confidence of the computed matching cost.”
- Real-Time Self-Adaptive Deep Stereo (2018, background): “Early attempts to leverage machine learning for stereo matching concerned estimating confidence measures [31], by random forest classifiers [12, 38, 26, 28] and – later – by CNNs [29, 36, 42], typically plugged into conventional pipelines to improve accuracy.”
- LAF-Net: Locally Adaptive Fusion Networks for Stereo Confidence Estimation (2019, methodology): “Most existing methods for stereo matching [10, 17, 45] cannot provide fully reliable results due to its challenging elements, thus several approaches [39, 27, 37, 18, 20] have presented an additional module to predict a confidence Q i of the disparity D i .”
- A Survey on Deep Learning Techniques for Stereo-Based Depth Estimation (2020, methodology): “Recent techniques are based on supervised learning [104], [105], [106], [107], [108], [109].”
- Computing the stereo matching cost with a convolutional neural network (2014, methodology): “[15] trained a random forest classifier to predict the confidence of the matching cost and used the predictions as soft constraints in a Markov random field to decrease the error of the stereo method.”
- Robust stereo matching with surface normal prediction (2017, background): “Conditional Random Field (CRF) framework, where disparity smoothness constraints only exist between neighbor pixels, and used as soft constraints in a global optimization framework to reduce the disparity ambiguity [32].”
- Efficient Deep Learning for Stereo Matching (2016, methodology): “, by combining several confidence measures via a random forest classifier [14], or by incorporating random forest predictions into a Markov random field [23].”